Skip to SKAI contentSKAI RADAR EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE EvidenceWhat happened, where, and when? ReasoningWhy might it matter to this business? DecisionWhat is the next responsible move? Open the sample report
The SKAI method
From change to a defensible decision.
SKAI does not treat every page edit as intelligence. It preserves evidence, tests relevance, explains uncertainty, and elevates only what may change a business decision.
Six accountable stages
Every conclusion keeps its path.
Collection, interpretation, and recommendation remain distinct, so leaders can inspect the reasoning instead of accepting a black-box answer.
- 01Define
Set the business, competitors, markets, priorities, and questions that make a change relevant.
- 02Watch
Check only the active, approved public scope and record when each source was observed.
- 03Verify
Compare history, suppress routine noise, and preserve the evidence behind a material change.
- 04Interpret
Keep observed fact separate from business inference, assumptions, contradictions, and limits.
- 05Decide
Compare acting, investigating, monitoring, or doing nothing; then bound the smallest responsible step.
- 06Remember
Retain evidence, ranking, review, and decision history without silently rewriting prior output.
A useful Brief can be quiet
SKAI does not manufacture urgency.
A completed review may produce several Signals, one material development, or none. Coverage health and limitations appear with the result, so silence can be evaluated.
Control before collection
Monitoring begins only after the account and source scope are approved.
Paid entitlement, an active customer-selected competitor, and source-policy approval must all be present. Removing a competitor removes it from future collection and current reporting.
See the work
Review a complete Executive Report.
The demonstration shows what SKAI scanned, which data was retained, how coverage and cadence are reported, what the evidence supports, and where the analysis must stop.